
He has muddled his opinion on this lately
I believe he used to explicitly say that it was AA77, and now he just says a Boeing 757, although all of his arguments are geared towards debunking all critiques of the official story that AA77 was the plane. So, even if he doesn't explicitly state it was AA77, he will shoot down any and every alternative that people put forward.
I don't think that it is such an important distinction whether it was AA77 or another Boeing 757 passenger plane which Hoffman contends, both positions are ludicrous. Even arguing that it was just a Boeing 757 passenger plane is propping up the official story that muslim hijackers attacked us, or that the Pentagon's anti-missile batteries somehow allowed it through, and is easy to disprove with examining the physical evidence.

Recent comments
1 day 7 hours ago
2 days 16 hours ago
2 days 16 hours ago
2 days 17 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
2 weeks 8 hours ago
2 weeks 4 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 16 hours ago