
Differences are important
I agree.
Differences in ideology, in behaviour, style, actions and demeanor,
differences in goals and methods, all sorts of differences between
individuals and groups need to be respected, understood, analyzed and
processed in good faith before any unity can be attempted.
Unity is "a good thing" (as they say in Amerikkka) but on what basis? And in which context?
Every agreement on unity needs to be defined according to the specific points of unity, and also according to elements that are not part of the agreement.
There is vey little common sense, negotiation, exploration, dialogue or
even just plain respect among 9/11 Truthers, at present, to forge any
kind of unity on the basis of anything. Issuing "calls" for Unity shows good intentions, but the question of How exactly is Unity to be achieved is most often ignored.
In everything we do, we need to be asking about (or putting forth) the
specific values and principles on which Unity is to be founded. That's
always a good start.
Petros
__________

Recent comments
5 weeks 5 days ago
5 weeks 5 days ago
6 weeks 3 hours ago
6 weeks 6 hours ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
6 weeks 1 day ago
6 weeks 3 days ago
6 weeks 3 days ago
6 weeks 6 days ago
7 weeks 3 hours ago